|
There's No Place Like Here
Sonoma State University Art Gallery Director Michael Schwager's curatorial statement for the show There's No Place Like Here, begins with a definition of place: place (plās), n. 1. a particular portion of space, whether of definite or indefinite extent. 2. the specific portion of space normally occupied by anything. 3. a space, area, or spot, set apart or used for a particular purpose. 4. a region or area. Within this broad definition, the various works of the show approach place from a number of strikingly different directions.
The only serious issue I would take with the show, which otherwise is a resonant amalgam filled with great talent, is the matter of titling. A trivial thing perhaps, but titles establish the tone of a show, like a hand on a tiller. My objection is not to the title's literary/filmic reference, whose tone I quite like, but to the particular substituting of "here" for "home." The insertion of "here" positions the title at odds with much of the work in the show, work that does not engage explicitly with the space that viewers occupy. In fact, most of the works in the show express distinct relationships with locations displaced in space or time--locations that are, if anywhere, elsewhere. I don't mean to beat up on Michael Schwager who has put together a commendable grouping of work; I just wish the title had been more in tune with the cohesive voice I so clearly felt while walking through the gallery.
In contrast to both Britton's and deSoto's meditations on the loss of the past, Yin Xiuhen's Portable City--Shenzhen actively combats the act of forgetting. Xiuhen's work consists of an open suitcase whose cavities are filled with a miniature stuffed-fabric version of her hometown skyline. From beneath the city, which fills the case zipper to zipper, emanates strains of Chinese popular music. This physical and aural re-creation sits on the ground in a blue-painted corner of the gallery on whose walls cities have been mapped by cartoonish giant yellow buttons. These button-cities are linked together by yellow string that stretches across the corner like a cats-cradle gone gigantically awry. The buttons mark all of the locations where the work has been exhibited and the string traces the path of its journey between them. There is something so childishly beautiful about this piece that it is hard not to like it. The buildings of little Shenzhen's downtown are not made to meticulously look like buildings but are chunkily constructed out of fabrics with distinctly textile patterns; florals and the like. Rather than being ill suited, the patterned silks add another distinctive texture of the place that this totem seeks to encapsulate. Like a favorite stuffed animal taken on vacation by a young child, Xiuhen's work functions as a comforting touch-stone, a little bit of what has been left behind that magically keeps it from being gone. I particularly like how this work suggests the way that each of us carries with us a sense of home and the places that have shaped us to every destination we go. All in all, There's No Place Like Here achieves an impressively nuanced effect for such a diverse show. While I have my favorites, the show is solid through and through. The pervasive feeling that the show left me with is so closely in tune with my own nostalgically brightened geography of homesick memory and bittersweet recollection that I have to say Bravo...what ever it is called. Posted December 4, 2007 2:28 PM (1678 words) « Joseph Cornell: Navigating the Imagination | Home | Nathan Lynch: Everything's Going South » |
Comments
Thank you for the thoughtful review of this show. I certainly agree that Michael created an intriguing discourse on the subject of "hereness". I wanted to comment on your description of my work. The images I created are not simply a depiction of layering through time—although that is part of what is depicted. The images are averages of tourist photos of iconic American natural wonders. It is crucial to the work that it is understood as tourist photos gleaned from websites. Tourism questions the concept of "hereness". The work began with my experience of tourists taking photos at Bryce Canyon. People would jump out of their cars, hold up a camera, snap the picture, return to their car. Thus, never really "dwelling" in/on the landscape. The image is the "here". The averaging reveals the consistency of vision of American landscape that was passed down to us from the 19th century romantics. The tourist photo, nostalgia, loss, containment and capturing of the idea of landscape, here yet not here, received notions about the framing of the landscape, American identity and the land, the social meaning of the captured tourist moment as proof of "hereness"—as here is the evidence of the place I have been, the immediate accessibility of these images through the web—virtual "hereness". These elements are crucial to the understanding of the work. Your description of the work barely scratches the surface of these images. Posted by: Elliot Anderson | December 12, 2007 | ||